Author: Legal Ants

  • Zoro.to

    Zoro.to Ranking and Traffic, Competitors

    Zoro.to is an online platform that can be assumed to offer connections to movies or TV shows or simply anime. It has to do with the word ‘Zoro.to,’ a character from a famous anime and manga series called One Piece, where the protagonist is a pirate with a straw hat. The site may have a niche orientation toward promoting anime or animated content.

    The purpose and goal of the site are simple in that it is designed to attract online users and provide them with information about the company. Is it for file sharing, for viewing my videos, for downloads and so on,

    Zoro.to Overview

    Zoro. to is a website where you can watch movies, TV series, Anime, and more for free without requiring signup. The size of the site is medium; however, it is free of charge, has a simple and convenient search, and a vast array of videos of different genres.

    Zero.to Ranking and Traffic

    As per Alexa Traffic Rank, the website Zoro. to is estimated at 8. 501, the most visited site globally, and 5. 194th most visited site in the United States. It gets more than 380,000 visits daily, with an average of more than 11 visits. Five million visits per month. This shows that Zoro has amassed a large number of visitors, although it hosts its content through illegitimate means.

    1. Global Rank: #88,231
    2. Country Rank: #58,899
    3. Category Rank: #1,610

    Visit Analysis Zoro.to

    Zoro.to Ranking and Traffic, Competitors (1)

    1. Total Visits: 948.3K
    2. Bounce Rate: 04%
    3. Pages per Visit:17
    4. Avg Visit Duration: 00:00:37

    Competitors Zoro.to

    Some of the top competitors and alternatives for Zoro.to for free streaming include:

    1. 123Movies: One of the biggest and most visited free movie streaming sites offers a great selection of movies.
    2. LookMovie: Categorizes movies and TV shows by the HD (high definition) quality.
    3. FMovies: There is a new release section with many videos, trainers, and available servers.
    4. YesMovies: The platform has many movies and TV series; you can request options.
    5. Vumoo: As mentioned, it is primarily a movie streaming platform that includes some TV shows.

    Despite this, Zoro.to is suitable to be ranked among the most popular free streaming sites; however, it is not entirely legal since it might violate copyrights.

    Top zoro.to Competitors

    In June 2024, we compiled a list of the top 10 websites similar to zoro.to based on keyword traffic, audience targeting, and market overlap.

    aniwatch. to:

    Hi, anime is a free anime streaming website where you can watch English subbed and dubbed anime online with no account and no daily updates. Watch now!

    • Global Rank: #38,743
    • Country Rank: #21,682
    • Category Rank: #733
    • Total Visits:2.4M
    • Bounce Rate:79.99%
    • Pages per Visit: 1.23
    • Avg Visit Duration: 00:00:22
    • Similarity Score: 100%

    Youtube.com

    YouTube.com is a website where you first have to sign up and login and enjoy the videos and music, send original content, and share it with friends and the world on YouTube.

    • Global Rank: #2
    • Country Rank: #2
    • Category Rank: #1
    • Total Visits: 29B
    • Bounce Rate: 23.49%
    • Pages per Visit: 11.16
    • Avg Visit Duration: 00:20:06
    • Similarity Score: 81%

    zorox. to

    zoro. to, zorotv, zorox. It is a free anime streaming website where you can watch English substituted and dubbed anime online with no account required and with daily updates. Watch now!

    • Global Rank: #81,523
    • Country Rank: #15,726
    • Category Rank: #420
    • Total Visits: 961.7K
    • Bounce Rate: 75.52%
    • Pages per Visit: 1.43
    • Avg Visit Duration: 00:00:55
    • Similarity Score: 81%

    Netflix.com

    Access Netflix movies and TV shows online, or stream them directly to your smart TV, game console, PC, Mac, mobile device, tablet, and more.

    • Global Rank: #26
    • Country Rank: #25
    • Category Rank: #2
    • Total Visits: 1.7B
    • Bounce Rate: 41.8%
    • Pages per Visit: 3.80
    • Avg Visit Duration: 00:07:21
    • Similarity Score: 77%

    hulu.com

    Access TV shows and movies online. Stream episodes of Shōgun and Grey’s Anatomy. Access shows like This Is Us, Bob’s Burgers, Brooklyn Nine-Nine, Empire, and SNL, along with hit movies, on your preferred devices. Begin your free trial today!

    • Global Rank: #231
    • Country Rank: #61
    • Category Rank: 4
    • Streaming & Online TV
    • Total Visits: 178.6M
    • Bounce Rate: 36%
    • Pages per Visit: 4.06
    • Avg Visit Duration:00:11:58
    • Similarity Score: 74%

    Conclusion

    Therefore, Zoro. to is one of the best sites for free streaming movies and television shows, as seen from the points discussed above. Despite having relatively good traffic and appearing quite popular amongst cord-cutters and streamers cutting their expenses on cable/satellite services, the site is technically piracy. The site is as helpful as it is risky, given that it offers free access to content and could contribute equally to piracy. However, the business’s future viability will depend on how it will address the issues with licensing and intellectual property as it progresses.

  • Bharat Rashtra Samithi: A National Political Force

    Bharat Rashtra Samithi

    Bharat Rashtra Samithi: A National Political Force

    The Bharat Rashtra Samithi or BRS was formerly Telangana Rashtra Samithi or TRS. This major political party changed from a regional to a national-level party. We review the history of the party, its guiding principles, and its influence on the politics of India.

    Origins and Transformation

    The party was formed in 2001 by K. Chandrashekar Rao, first under Telangana Rashtra Samithi. Its main objective was to obtain statehood for Telangana, a region in Andhra Pradesh. Born out of a highly successful movement that culminated in the formation of Telangana’s new state in 2014. The party was renamed the Bharat Rashtra Samithi in 2022, implying its larger dream to be a significant force on the Indian political stage.

    Ideology and Vision

    Core Principles

    The BRS conforms to the center-left concept of policy and focuses on social justice, humane social progress, and economic and regional growth. It has taken a stand on farmers, water issues, and, in general, the geographical, regional, and equitable distribution of resources in India. Land and resource control conflicts have fueled tensions between herders and farmers, further exacerbating regional insecurity BBC Zamfara.

    National Aspirations

    With its metamorphosis from the Telangana Rashtra Samithi to the Bharat Rashtra Samithi, the party has offered a template for running the country. It calls for more robust federalism, increased state powers, democracy, and a new model of development that considers the inequalities of regions.

    Political Impact and Governance

    Bharat Rashtra Samithi

    Telangana Model

    The BRS has been in power since Telangana was formed in 2014. During its rule, numerous progressive policies were launched in Telangana. Such as the Rythu Bandhu program for the farmers and Mission Bhagiratha for the water supply. These have attracted national attention and have been partly imitated by other states.

    Electoral Performance

    The party has an unbroken control of the politics of Telangana and has been continuously successful in the state elections. Its performance in local body elections has also been good, showing that the party has a strong base at the grassroots level.

    Challenges and Controversies

    Opposition Criticisms

    The BRS has faced criticism from the opposition parties in its current structure. For example, in the following cases, some of them are Dynastic politics, where several members of the party’s founder hold influential positions. Other critics have also sought to challenge the party’s competency in such issues by claiming they cannot repeat such success at the national level.

    Policy Implementation Debates

    There has been a controversy regarding the sustainability and economic repercussions of these welfare programs, but the party schemes have indeed been diverse. The BRS government’s attitude toward land grabbing for development projects has also caused much debate.

    National Expansion Strategy

    Alliance Building

    In line with its national agenda, the BRS has reached out to regional parties in all the states of India. Its goal is to foster state-based parties to reduce the monopoly of national-level parties in the Indian political system.

    Focus on Agrarian Issues

    The party has been very active on issues of agricultural reforms and farmer’s lives at the center. It should complement its core strength in rural Rotarians in Telangana and may play in mainly other agricultural states.

    Future Prospects

    2024 General Elections

    The BRS’s ability to contest the 2024 Indian general elections will test its viability on the national stage. The party’s prospects of capturing seats not in Telangana and its ability to shape coalition politics will define TRS’s position in national politics.

    Policy Influence

    Although it may not become a significant force at the national level in the foreseeable future, the solutions proposed by the BRS in policy-making and governance in Telangana might contribute to national debates. Especially in agro-industrial production, water regulation, and intergovernmental relations.

    The Bharat Rashtra Samithi is an excellent example of a regional party that tried to expand its activity to the national level. Even its evolution from being an anti-Hindu conversion to a state-level political party and now a party that has the potential to become a part of the national level government portrays the vigor of Indian politics. In the future years, will it be eventful to see whether the BRS will be able to introduce itself beyond the Telangana region in the coming political map of India?

    Conclusion

    The Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS), the Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS), transitioned from a regional to a national political party in 2022. Founded by K. Chandrashekar Rao in 2001 to advocate for Telangana’s statehood, the party gained prominence after Telangana’s formation in 2014. The BRS promotes center-left policies focusing on social justice, economic growth, and equitable resource distribution.

    It successfully implemented notable welfare schemes in Telangana, gaining national attention while maintaining a strong political presence in local elections. However, the party faces criticism over dynastic politics and questions about the sustainability of its policies. As it prepares for the 2024 general elections, the BRS aims to expand its influence beyond Telangana through alliances with regional parties and an emphasis on pastoral issues. Its future impact on national politics remains to be seen.

  • Cast:042rxxybmwi= Lincoln Lawyer

    Cast:042rxxybmwi= Lincoln Lawyer

    Stars of “The Lincoln Lawyer” Cast

    “The Lincoln Lawyer” is a popular TV series that has captured audiences with its compelling legal drama. Let’s look at the talented cast that brings this show to life.

    Manuel Garcia-Rulfo as Mickey Haller

    Manuel Garcia-Rulfo plays the lead role of Mickey Haller, a charismatic defense attorney who works out of his Lincoln Town Car.

    Background

    • Born on February 25, 1981, in Jalisco, Mexico
    • He started his career in Mexican cinema before moving to Hollywood

    Notable Works

    • “From Dusk till Dawn: The Series”
    • “Sicario: Day of the Soldado”
    • “Murder on the Orient Express”
    • “6 Underground”

    Garcia-Rulfo’s versatility and screen presence have made him a rising star in film and television.

    Neve Campbell as Maggie McPherson

    Neve Campbell portrays Maggie McPherson, Mickey’s ex-wife and a talented lawyer in her own right.

    Career Highlights

    • Rose to fame in the 1990s
    • Starred as Julia Salinger in “Party of Five”
    • Iconic role as Sidney Prescott in the “Scream” franchise

    Other Achievements

    • Performed in London’s West End
    • He continues to be a prominent figure in film and television

    Campbell’s ability to tackle diverse roles has cemented her status as a versatile actress.

    Angus Sampson as Cisco

    Angus Sampson plays Cisco, Mickey’s skilled investigator who adds depth to the storylines.

    Multi-talented Artist

    • Australian actor, director, writer, and producer
    • He is known for his versatile talent

    Notable Roles

    • Gained prominence in the “Insidious” film series
    • Appeared in various film and television roles

    Sampson’s ability to adapt to diverse characters makes him a valuable asset to “The Lincoln Lawyer” cast.

    Jazz Raycole as Izzy

    Jazz Raycole takes on the role of Izzy, Mickey’s loyal driver and assistant.

    Early Career

    • Born on February 11, 1988, in Stockton, California
    • Started as a dancer before transitioning to acting

    Acting Journey

    • Best known as Claire Kyle in “My Wife and Kids”
    • Appeared in shows like “The Soul Man” and “Jericho.”

    Raycole brings a unique blend of street smarts and resourcefulness to her character in the series.

    Becki Newton as Mickey’s Second Wife

    Becki Newton plays Mickey’s second wife, maintaining a close bond with him despite their separation.

    Career Highlights

    • Born on July 4, 1978, in New Haven, Connecticut
    • Famous for her role as Amanda Tanen in “Ugly Betty”

    Versatile Performer

    • Known for both comedic and dramatic roles
    • Has appeared in various TV shows and films

    Newton’s role in “The Lincoln Lawyer” showcases her ability to adapt to different genres.

    Yaya DaCosta as Andrea Freeman

    Yaya DaCosta portrays Andrea Freeman, Mickey’s frequent courtroom opponent and a friend of his ex-wife Maggie.

    Career Path

    • Runner-up in Cycle 3 of “America’s Next Top Model”
    • Transitioned successfully from modeling to acting

    Notable Performances

    • Portrayed Whitney Houston in the Lifetime film “Whitney”
    • Appeared in various popular TV shows and movies

    DaCosta’s role adds an exciting dynamic to the series, providing engaging courtroom scenes.

    Krista Warner as Hayley

    Krista Warner plays Hayley, the teenage daughter of Mickey and Maggie.

    Emerging Talent

    • Relatively new to the acting scene
    • Her role in “The Lincoln Lawyer” marks an essential step in her career

    Warner’s performance as Hayley adds a family dimension to the show, contributing to the overall narrative depth.

    Conclusion

    “The Lincoln Lawyer” is a popular TV series featuring a talented cast. Manuel Garcia-Rulfo stars Mickey Haller, a defense attorney operating from his Lincoln Town Car, who is noted for his versatility in various film roles. Neve Campbell plays his ex-wife, Maggie McPherson, showcasing her acting solid background from the ’90s. Angus Sampson is Cisco, the skilled investigator known for his work in the “Insidious” series. Jazz Raycole portrays Izzy, Mickey’s resourceful driver, while Becki Newton plays his second wife, exhibiting her adaptability in various roles. Yaya DaCosta is Andrea Freeman, bringing a dynamic presence as a courtroom opponent, and Krista Warner plays Hayley, Mickey’s teenage daughter, adding depth to the family narrative. The ensemble’s performances contribute significantly to the show’s engaging legal drama.

  • Why are Sawed-off Off Shotguns Illegal

    Why are Sawed-off Off Shotguns Illegal

    Sawed-off shotguns are prohibited because they pose a severe threat to the public and public safety. A sawed-off gun is one in which the barrel or stock has been cut below a limited length. Other restrictions apply under U.S. federal law. The maximum allowable barrel and total size of firearms that civilians may possess. These restrictions apply to long guns, which are prohibited from being owned and possessed except under certain circumstances. The question that comes to mind now is why such law are enacted.

    A Timeline Of Sawed-Off Shotguns: Legislative History

    Before the second decade of the twentieth century, sawn-off shotguns started being linked to crime and violence. These handguns were favored because of their compact size, and they could be easily concealed and used in various enclosed spaces by criminals. The 1929 St. is another famous example, the Valentine’s Day Massacre, where criminals used sawn-off guns to promote their criminal activities. The National Firearms Act of 1934 was a law that prohibited the purchase of criminal firearms, such as rifles and shotguns. It specified a minimum barrel length of 18 inches and a minimum overall length of 26 inches.

    Sawed-off shotguns were required to be registered and taxed. Later laws, such as the 1968 Firearms Act, expanded these regulations to include long guns.

    As Noted Above, Sawn-Off Guns Are Banned In The United States For The Following Reasons:

    There are several significant reasons why federal laws restrict-sawed-off shotguns in the U.S.

    1. Concealability: The small size of the barrel and cylinder makes the possession of sawed-off shotguns concealed in vehicles, garments, bags, and tiny hideaways quite accessible. This concealability was beneficial to the criminals and dangerous to society as it enabled them to flee the crime scene quickly, thus making it hard for the authorities to apprehend them.
    2. Spread of Shot: Less length of a barrel of a sawed-off shotgun results in wider dispersion of the shot each time it is fired. It is done to make it harder to aim the weapon and make it possible to hit more targets at close range. The conditions these attributes provided were favorable to criminals and threatened public safety.
    3. Difficulty to Identify: This stubby size also makes sawed-off shotguns hard to distinguish during crimes and hinders investigation.
    4. High Damage: Sawed-off shotguns used at close range deal lethal blows with one shot rather than other firearms due to wider dispersal of shots. It made them suitable instruments for use in crimes such as armed robbery, assault, as well as murder.
    5. Crime Association: The Mobsters and other notorious criminals using sawed-off shotguns to persecute their adversaries. During the robbery also contributed to the public perception of this weapon type as extremely lethal and deserving of stringent regulation.

    Constricting the rules on shotguns and their transfer to prohibitively limit their possession to magazine lengths that are less concealable and lethal. Lawmakers intended to deter the use of sawed-off shotguns in criminal activities.

    Counterarguments Against the Ban

     

    While there were strong reasons to restrict sawed-off shotguns, some counterarguments question the effectiveness of outright bans. While there were strong reasons to limit sawed-off shotguns, some counterarguments question the effectiveness of outright bans.

    They Don’t Reduce Gun Crime Rates: Some of the laws enacted include restrictions on sawed-off shotguns. Which, to date, has not been proven that these laws helped reduce crimes committed using guns. It may switch to other guns that are likely to have the same dangerous impacts as those already banned.

    They Don’t Prevent Illegal Conversions: Criminals can saw off the barrels of a shotgun against the prohibition for such actions to be done by anyone. Perhaps bans may be primarily targeted at ordinary law-abiding citizens rather than potential misusers of such items.

    Crime Usage Rates Are Low: FBI Uniform Crime Report data show that for all reported gun crimes. Less than 3% involve any shotgun, legal or unlawful. Thus, there are likely to be few impacts in preventing crime by restricting rarely used weapons. Enhance the capacity of law enforcement agencies to combat banditry and enforce the rule of law effectively in BBC Hausa Labaran Duniya Da Dumi-Duminsu Zamfara.

    Self-Defense Uses Exist: Few legal cases allowed using short-barreled shotguns for self-defense in specific conditions, such as in automobiles and small stores. Absolute prohibitions preclude such legitimate uses of firearms for self-defense.

    Nevertheless, the arguments presented by attorneys of sawed-off shotguns’ strict regulation stemmed from reasonable and compelling initial public safety concerns in the early twentieth century. The subsequent cultural perception of them as weapons of crime has continued to keep stringent measures on using the devices.

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, federal laws made shortened “sawed-off” shotguns unlawful for civilians to own mainly because they are highly concealable, cause much damage and were involved in criminal, violent actions in the past. These public safety concerns were the rationale for the maximum legal requirements that governed the allowable barrel length and the overall gun length. However, some analysis suggests that outright bans of firearms might have only a slight deterrent effect on gun crime and deny legitimate lawful use.

    Inequalities, especially cultural perception and enforcement problems, also maintain the status quo restrictions. But the causes for their current legal status as prohibited emerged from admirable intentions to minimize the evil that the concealed danger of a weapon. Admittedly dangerous  represented during a period of high violence in U.S. history. The debate over the restriction of their use is as follows. The rationale of limiting their access due to criminal activities is balanced by the question of restricting the access of their ownership in today’s gun control policies.

  • Madurai High Court Judgement

    Madurai High Court Judgement

    Madurai High Court Judgement bench is located in Madurai. It has the Kanyakumari, Tirunelveli, Thoothukudi, Tenkasi, Madurai, Dindigul, Ramanathapuram, Virudhunagar, Theni, Sivaganga, Pudukottai, Thanjavur, Tiruchirappalli and Karur districts under its Jurisdiction.

    Contact Us

    • Chief Administrative Officer, Principal District Court, Madurai.
    • Phone No: 0452 2537597
    • Court Manager, Principal District Court, Madurai.
    • Phone No: 0452 2537515
    • Mail to: madurai.ecourt@gmail.com
    • mdu.pdc-tn@indiancourts.nic.in.

    Which Year Was the Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court Started?

    The Madras High Court Bench at Madurai was inaugurated on Saturday, the 24th of July of 2004, by Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.C. LAHOTI, Chief Justice of India. Justice B. Subashan Reddy, the then Chief Justice of the Madras High Court, presided over it.

    The region is believed to have been covered with Kadamba forest, called Kadambavanam. The city is referred to by various names, including “Madurai,” “Koodal,” “Malligai Maanagar,” “Naanmadakoodal,” and “Thirualavai.”

    How much time is required to get a court order?

    The time frame for obtaining a stay order from a court in India depends on several factors, such as the Jurisdiction, the nature and complexity of the case, and the court’s workload. On average, obtaining a stay order from the court may take anywhere from 2 weeks to several months.

    A.S.(M.D.).Nos.114 and 115 of 2024 A.S.(M.D.).Nos.114 and 115 of 2024 and C.M.P.(M.D.)No.6077 of 2024 S. SRIMATHY, J The absorb Counsel appearing for the appellants in both cases submitted that the appellants have already gifted a portion of land to the Temple. Moreover, there is a lot of land behind the School. The master Counsel appearing for the appellants in both cases has proposed that there can be an exchange of lands so that the School need not be disturbed. Instead of the suit property, the appellants are ready and willing to give the land adjacent to the present suit property. 2. Therefore, the respondents are directed to consider the same and report

    How to Read Lengthy Judgements?

    Madurai High Court Judgement

    Anyone who studies law will eventually have to read judgments. But what is the best way to read a case to understand it fully? Reading lengthy judgments is a tedious but most important task for a law student. As a law student, you might have to prepare summaries, too!

    When reading a case, you must know the typical structure of a case report, which will help you understand what you’re reading. Eventually, you’ll also need to be able to learn how to follow the often complex legal reasoning in judgments and understand what precedent is created by any given case. It is a skill built up over time and requires some practice. This section introduces you to some of these skills and provides a brief overview. For more information, we suggest you look at some of the Further Reading, which gives more detailed worked examples.

    What is a Madurai High Court Judgement/Case. 

    As a law student, you should first learn what a Judgment is. Judgment, in all legal systems, is a decision of a court adjudicating the parties’ rights to a legal action before it. A judge gives a legal judgment; the opinions are not written with the law student in mind.

    Understanding the fundamental legal issues not being addressed as a law student can be challenging, especially for those who study controversial topics. A newcomer is ushered in by the legal system and often falls into the shadows.

    For You To Understand The Facts, Focus On the Following Three Things:

    1. what has happened that has provoked someone to take this case to court;
    2. what happened at the trial court that provoked someone to appeal;
    3. What did the higher court do with this case?

    You Might Not Understand A Case At First Reading

    While reading a case for the first time, you don’t understand much of it or might not understand the main points. Don’t worry. Try rereading the case and take your time with it.

    It’s an excellent idea to skim-read the case report/summary that is available first to get a general overview. Then, reread the essential parts in more detail.

    I Read It Several Times.

    Read the case several times, and read it carefully. It’s an entirely different skill from, for example, reading a novel or a newspaper.

    Break The Case Into Following Components

    Madurai High Court Judgement

    As you start to read judgments, divide the following sections. It will help you to understand it effectively as you go on to read judgments till the end.

    1. Name Of The Case;
    2. Name Of The Court Which Decided The Case;
    3. Date Of Decision;
    4. Citation Of The Case;
    5. Name Of Judge Or Judges;
    6. Judgment
    7. procedure by which the case came before the court or tribunal (if the original Jurisdiction is so stated). It may also include-
    8. the relief the plaintiff asked for in the lower court
    9. what defendant asked the lower court to do
    10. what the lower court was complained of by the party appealing
    11. the facts before the court for decision. In setting out complicated facts, adopt chronological Order;
    12. the legal question or questions or issues involved;
    13. important arguments of Counsel;
    14. decision;
    15. reasons for the decision and
    16. reasons for dissenting opinions, if any.

    Make Notes Madurai High Court Judgement

    Make notes as you read, and even draw diagrams if it helps you understand the judges’ words.  It will help you keep track of the facts and avoid confusion. You may create notes by following these points.

    Conclusion

    Know and understand the root cause of filing the Case- The prime and foremost thing that should be done is to know the root cause of registering the case. Don’t become discouraged! It is a skill that does become easier the more you practice it. Keep the practice of reading the judgments regularly to master the art of learning the decisions, and then you can see the change.

  • Madras High Court Case Status

    Madras High Court Case Status

    Madras High Court Case Status granted a patent by Queen Victoria and established in Presidency towns, has been given a citation for its case status dated 26 June 1862. It is the highest court in Tamil Nadu and exercises its original jurisdiction over the town. With exclusive powers under letters patent, including civil and criminal prosecution and the Indian Act, Madras has complete appellate authority over the whole State.

    The Honorable Chief Justice is the head of the judicial and executive powers of the Supreme Court and the administration of law throughout the State. The Chief Coordinator oversees the general policy implemented in the administration of justice.

    The Government of India, in exercising the powers conferred by Article 51. 2 of the Land Reforms Act, 1956 by the judgment of the Madras High Court (Establishment of Standard Standard, 2004 at Madurai), reported on 6. This resolution ordered the establishment at Madurai of a permanent seat of the High Court of Madras, with not less than five judges appointed by the Chief Justice to sit there to work their powers and rights in pending cases.

    After the judicial division of Madurai into two judicial districts in 2006, the number of districts under the control of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court increased to 13. However, for the original jurisdiction, the Madurai court will exercise jurisdiction in all matters. In the case of the High Court Chennai, the Madras High Court grounds at Madurai were inaugurated on Saturday, 24 July 2004, by Hon’ble Justice R. C. LAHOTI, Chief Justice of India. Subashan Reddy, the then Chief Justice of the Madras High Court, presided.

    Permanent Judges In Madras High Court Case Status

    The Madras High Court sits in Chennai and has jurisdiction over the State of Tamil Nadu. It is granted to have a maximum of 75 judges, of which 56 may be permanently appointed, and 19 may be additionally appointed. Currently, it has 64 judges.

    No Judge Date of Joining Date of Retirement
    1 R. Mahadevan (A.C.J.) 25-Oct-13 09-Jun-25
    2 D. Krishnakumar 07-Apr-16 21-May-25
    3 S. S. Sundar 07-Apr-16 02-May-25
    4 R. Subramanian 05-Oct-16 24-Jul-25
    5 M. Sundar 05-Oct-16 18-Jul-28
    6 R. Suresh Kumar 05-Oct-16 28-May-26
    7 J. Nisha Banu 05-Oct-16 17-Sep-28
    8 M. S. Ramesh 05-Oct-16 27-Dec-25
    9 S. M. Subramaniam 05-Oct-16 30-May-27
    10 Dr. Anita Sumanth 05-Oct-16 14-Apr-32
    11 P. Velmurugan 05-Oct-16 08-Jun-27
    12 Dr. G. Jayachandran 05-Oct-16 31-Mar-27
    13 C. V. Karthikeyan 05-Oct-16 13-Dec-26
    14 R. M. T. Teeka Raman 16-Nov-16 08-Jun-25
    15 N. Sathish Kumar 16-Nov-16 05-May-29
    16 N. Seshasayee 16-Nov-16 07-Jan-25
    17 V. Bhavani Subbaroyan 28-Jun-17 16-May-25
    18 A. D. Jagadish Chandira 28-Jun-17 14-Feb-28
    19 G. R. Swaminathan 28-Jun-17 31-May-30
    20 Abdul Quddhose 28-Jun-17 07-Sep-31
    21 M. Dhandapani 28-Jun-17 14-Apr-30
    22 Pondicherry Daivasigamani Audikesavalu 28-Jun-17 29-Dec-32
    23 Vivek Kumar Singh 22-Sep-17 24-Mar-30
    24 R. Hemalatha 01-Dec-17 30-Apr-25
    25 P. T. Asha 04-Jun-18 21-Aug-28
    26 N. Nirmal Kumar 04-Jun-18 22-Nov-27
    27 N. Anand Venkatesh 04-Jun-18 03-Jul-31
    28 G. K. Ilanthiraiyan 04-Jun-18 08-Jul-32
    29 Krishnan Ramaswamy 04-Jun-18 02-Jun-30
    30 C. Saravanan 04-Jun-18 30-Nov-33
    31 B. Pugalendhi 20-Nov-18 24-May-29
    32 Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy 22-Feb-19 01-Oct-28
    33 Battu Devanand 13-Jan-20 13-Apr-28
    34 A. A. Nakkiran 03-Dec-20 09-May-25
    35 Veerasamy Sivagnanam 03-Dec-20 31-May-25
    36 Ilangovan Ganesan 03-Dec-20 04-Jun-25
    37 Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup 03-Dec-20 17-Jul-25
    38 Murali Shankar Kuppuraju 03-Dec-20 30-May-30
    39 Manjula Ramaraju Nalliah 03-Dec-20 15-Feb-26
    40 Thamilselvi T. Valayapalayam 03-Dec-20 18-Jun-30
    41 Sundaram Srimathy 20-Oct-21 09-Jan-29
    42 D. Bharatha Chakravarthy 20-Oct-21 23-Jul-33
    43 R. Vijayakumar 20-Oct-21 21-Dec-32
    44 Mohammed Shafiq 20-Oct-21 05-Mar-34
    45 J. Sathya Narayana Prasad 29-Oct-21 14-Mar-31
    46 Mummineni Sudheer Kumar 24-Mar-22 19-May-31
    47 Devaraju Nagarjuna 24-Mar-22 14-Aug-24
    48 Nidumolu Mala 28-Mar-22 23-Apr-29
    49 S. Sounthar 28-Mar-22 28-Jul-33
    50 Sunder Mohan 06-Jun-22 01-Nov-31
    51 Kabali Kumaresh Babu 06-Jun-22 13-Dec-31

    Additional  Judges

    1 Lekshmana Chandra Victoria Gowri 07-Feb-23
    2 Pillaipakkam Bahukutumbi Balaji 07-Feb-23
    3 Kandhasami Kulandaivelu Ramakrishnan 07-Feb-23
    4 Ramachandran Kalaimathi 07-Feb-23
    5 K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi 07-Feb-23
    6 Venkatachari Lakshminarayanan 27-Feb-23
    7 Periyasamy Vadamalai 27-Mar-23
    8 Ramasamy Sakthivel 23-May-23
    9 P. Dhanabal 23-May-23
    10 Chinnasamy Kumarappan 23-May-23
    11 Kandasamy Rajasekar 23-May-23
    12 N. Senthilkumar 16-Oct-23
    13 G. Arul Murugan 16-Oct-23

    Madras High Court Case Status

    COURT LINK ALSO AVAILABLE IN https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/vclink/

    Dedicated Commercial Courts April 2024

    Form 1 List Of Madras High Court Case Status E-Filed During The Month

    S.NO.  COURT DISTRICT   CASE TYPE CASE NUMBER DATE OF REGISTRATION PETITIONER NAME V/S RESPONDENT NAME ADVOCATE ADVOCATE MOBILE NUMBER ADVOCATE EMAIL ID DATE OF E-FILING
    1 Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai-08.  Chennai C.O.S. 77/2024 02.01.2024 Madras Mandi. The unit of Sri Annamalai Agro Product Private Limited VS Brydan Foods S.R. Varun Kumar 9940258405      —————  03.04.2024
    Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai-08.  Chennai C.O.S. 80/2024 06.11.2023 M/s Forestal Mimosa Limited. VS M/s. Sara Suole Private Limited M/s. Nithysh Sekhar  – 8760412451      ————— 05.04.2024
    Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai-08.  Chennai C.O.S. 81/2024 30.11.2023 M/s. Dhruv Communication LLP VS M/S Faizus Communications M/S. Thiru Maran 9841086903      —————  06.04.2024
    Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai-08.  Chennai C.O.S. 82/2024 30.11.2023 3M/S. Dhruv Communication LLP VS M/S. Sree Venkateswara Traders M/S. Thiru Maran 9841086903      ————— 06.04.2024
    Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai-08.  Chennai C.O.S. 83/2024 06.04.2024 Ahl Freight India Pvt Ltd. VS Indian Agarbatti Manufacturers. M/S. M.Ganesan 9884286456      —————  08.04.2024
    2 Commercial Court in the Cadre of District Judge Level, Cbe (newly constituted on 11.03.2023)  Coimbatore C.O.S  26/2024  05.04.2024 M/s Navayugam Trust Vs M/s Gyanodhayam Educational Trust POORVAJA A R Vs Ramachandran.B 8610361250 Vs 9791336779      ————— 04.04.2024
    Commercial Court in the Cadre of District Judge Level, Cbe (newly constituted on 11.03.2023) Coimbatore C.O.S 27/2024 06.04.2024 Srinivasa Bhat, Sole Proprietor Of Ms Motor India Vs. Ms. Biogen Fertilizers India Pvt Ltd  R.VENKATESAN Vs Rajan.K.T  9443094094 Vs 9443094094      —————  10.02.2024
    Commercial Court in the Cadre of District Judge Level, Cbe (newly constituted on 11.03.2023) Coimbatore C.O.S 31/2024 30.04.2024 M/s Roots Industries India Limited Rep By Senior General Manager Mr P Vijay Vs. M/s Priya Enterprises Rep By Its Proprietor Mr. Shankar SUNDARA KADESWARAN M 9994996820      ————— 22.04.2024
    Commercial Court in the Cadre of District Judge Level, Cbe (newly constituted on 11.03.2023) Coimbatore C.O.S 32/2024 30.04.2024 Ganesh Department Store Vs. Selvanayaki Traders Shiny K 7708964764      —————  29.04.2024
     Commercial Court in the Cadre of District Judge Level, Cbe (newly constituted on 11.03.2023) Coimbatore  C.O.S 33/2024 30.04.2024 M/s Real Link Engineering India Private Ltd Rep By Its Director Mr. Navaneethakrishnan Vs. L And T Valves Limited Rep By Cheif Executive And Director SUNDARA KADESWARAN M 9894706428      ————— 30.04.2024
    Commercial Court in the Cadre of District Judge Level, Cbe (newly constituted on 11.03.2023) Coimbatore  A.O.P  9/2024  04.04.2024  R Guruswamy Vs M Sivakumar  M/s RAMANI AND SHANI(AR Vs K. RAJASEKAR, 9994910834 advocate 493@gmail.com 04.04.2024
    Commercial Court in the Cadre of District Judge Level, Cbe (newly constituted on 11.03.2023) Coimbatore E.P 75/2024 06.04.2024 Sree Krishna Build Tech Private Limited Rep By Its Managing Director K Kannan Vs. Puravankara Ltd Rep By Its Managing Director  A RAJESH KANNA 9842264221 arkcbe@yahoo.com 04.04.2024
    3 Commercial Court in the Cadre of Senior Civil Judge Level, Cbe (newly constituted on 11.03.2023) Coimbatore  EP 144/2024  02-04-2024 M/s Shriram Finance Limited Rep By Their Authorized Representative P Senthilkumar Vs M Arumuganainar F.BASIL M.S.No.2670/2014 9965260408  basilbscbl@gmail.com 02.04.2024
    4 District Commercial Court Salem ———- ——- ————- ————————- ————– ————- ————————- Nil
    5 Commercial Court (Senior Civil Judge) Salem C.O.S. 25/2024 01-04-2024  State Bank Of India, SMEC cum SARC Branch, rep by its Chief Manager Vs. Kalaivani Agencies A Sole Proprietorship Concern Represented By Its Proprietor, Mr. P Suresh Kumar K.S. Jegaraj 9443290546 sbi.61074@sbi.co.in 27-03-2024

    Dedicated Commercial Courts April 2024

    List Of The Total Number Of Madras High Court Case Status Randomly Allocated During The Month

    S.N O COURT District  CASE TYPE CASE COUNT (NO OF CASES RANDOMLY ALLOCATED)
    1 Commercial Court Chennai C.O.S. 39
    Commercial Court Chennai EP 3
    2 Commercial Court in the Cadre of District Judge Level, Coimbatore Coimbatore  C.O.S. 5
    The Commercial Court in the Cadre of District Judge Level, Coimbatore Coimbatore A.O.P. 1
    Commercial Court in the Cadre of District Judge Level, Coimbatore Coimbatore EP 1
    Commercial Court in the Cadre of District Judge Level, Coimbatore Coimbatore C.A.S.
    3 Commercial Court in the Cadre of Senior Civil Judge Level, Coimbatore Coimbatore C.O.S. 18
    Commercial Court in the Cadre of Senior Civil Judge Level, Coimbatore Coimbatore EP 16
    4 District Commercial Court Salem C.O.S. 13
    District Commercial Court Salem ArOP 6
    District Commercial Court Salem EP in C.O.S. 8
    District Commercial Court Salem  EP in ArOP 54
    District Commercial Court Salem C.M.A. 2
    5  Commercial Court (Senior Civil Judge), Salem Salem C.O.S. 71
     Commercial Court (Senior Civil Judge), Salem Salem R.E.P. in C.O.S. 3
     Commercial Court (Senior Civil Judge), Salem Salem R.E.P. in Ar. O.P 27
    TOTAL COUNT=267

    Conclusion

    We will give you as much information as possible about the status of the Madras High Court’s case. You can get any info from here. In the Filing Number box, enter the Filing Number of the Case. In the Year box, enter the Case Filing Year. Enter the Captcha, the five characters shown on the screen in the text box provided.